With a catalog of over 5 million tracks, Audiomack provides an extensive library of streaming music spanning genres and eras. However, some users are perplexed when they cannot find certain songs or albums while searching Audiomack.
There are a few key reasons why Audiomack lacks some songs, ranging from licensing restrictions to intentional curation. Understanding what shapes the Audiomack music library helps set proper expectations when using the platform.
Overview of the Audiomack Music Platform
Audiomack is a hip-hop focused streaming service enabling:
- Streaming music across web, iOS, and Android apps.
- Following favorite new artists and playlists.
- Sharing songs, albums, and mixtapes.
- Uploading original music as an artist.
- Listening to music offline.
- Joining streaming communities.
While extensive, Audiomack’s collection has deliberate boundaries.
Record Label and Publisher Licensing Deals
Like all streaming platforms, Audiomack’s catalog is shaped by:
- Negotiated licenses enabling distribution of artists’ catalogs by labels.
- Royalty payments to rights holders based on stream volume.
- Gaps where licensing deals couldn’t be reached.
Securing rights overrides fully open song availability.
Intentional Curation of Library Content
Audiomack focuses on:
- Hip-hop music spanning classics to newcomers.
- Related genres like rap, R&B, soul, funk, electronic.
- Music support ecosystem of MCs, DJs, producers.
This guides editors hand-selecting music for the service fitting its identity.
Royalty Rate Structures Influencing Catalog
Audiomack pays rights holders a combination of:
- Per stream payout rates.
- Revenue share formulas.
- Ad and subscription monetization.
Higher royalty costs limit economically viable music scope.
Allocation of Library Investment Resources
Given budget limitations:
- Editors prioritize song licensing in targeted genres.
- Investments steer toward highly trafficked music likely to attract and retain users.
- Less demand for niche music outside core mandate results in fewer acquisitions.
Library development focuses on the most appealing content aligned with audience tastes.
Limiting Objectionable or Explicit Content
Audiomack selectively avoids music containing:
- Explicit lyrics with frequent profanity, misogyny, violence.
- Controversial content jeopardizing brand safety for advertisers.
- Questionable legality or copyright foundations.
This elevates audio quality while moderating vulgarity.
Regional Availability Differences in Libraries
Music rights often vary by country, resulting in certain songs only accessible in:
- Territory of artist’s label as copyright owner.
- Regions covered by streaming license agreements.
Users in other countries get blocked when streaming restricted content.
Rarity of Certain Niche Genres and Mixes
Some music is rare in all streaming platforms:
- White labels and custom DJ mixes avoid rights issues.
- Obscure regional genres lack mass market appeal.
- Outdated formats not digitized like acapella, disco.
- Hard-to-license samples block clearing samples legally.
Niche content flies under the mainstream streaming radar.
Focus on Emerging Artists Over Catalog
Audiomack spotlights rising talent over back catalogs:
- Editors feature promising up-and-coming musicians.
- Playlisting focuses on new releases over classic albums.
- Back catalog licensing is costlier and less enticing for users.
This emphasis fills a vital role propelling emerging artists.
Uploading Gaps for User-Provided Content
Unlike record label content, user uploads on Audiomack are:
- Not fully controlled for licensing and rights.
- Taken down upon receiving complaints.
This reactive approach has unavoidable coverage gaps compared to label catalogs.
Search and Discovery Limitations
Audiomack’s search and recommendations miss more niche music since:
- Algorithms suggest content similar to mainstream hits.
- Less commonly sought content gets lower rankings.
- No index or metadata existing for rare user uploads.
The “long tail” of music resists algorithmic discovery.
Caching Latency for Newly Added Tracks
When new albums and songs are added:
- It takes time to fully index and cache them for streaming.
- Hours or days of latency occur before widely searchable and discoverable.
Trying again later allows newly onboarded content to fully populate throughout Audiomack’s systems.
Reporting Missing Songs and Albums for Addition
To request currently unavailable music:
- Use the app’s “Request Song” feature on artist pages.
- Submit suggestions to editors via social media and Audiomack forums.
- Aggregated requests inform content acquisition priorities.
User input helps expand the library within copyright bounds.
Using Multiple Streaming Services to Fill Gaps
Leveraging platforms like YouTube Music and SoundCloud fills in gaps:
- Each service has content strengths based on licenses.
- Multi-platform cross-search finds full song selection across catalogs.
- Create playlists combining tracks from different services.
No single service offers fully comprehensive music discovery.
Linking Multiple Accounts into Audiomack
Connect other streaming accounts to import playlists:
- Audiomack allows linking Spotify, YouTube, SoundCloud, etc.
- Matching songs cross-populate between linked services.
- Play song radio based on imports to find related recommendations.
Linking accounts merges different libraries for expanded variety.
The Positives of a More Curated Library
While limiting, a selective catalog has upsides:
- Avoids trawling through millions of poorly matched songs.
- Tight focus provides cohesive listening experience.
- Quality over quantity when discovering new artists.
Curation surfaces the very best music per user preferences.
Closing Thoughts on Gaps in the Audiomack Catalog
While Audiomack lacks full universal song coverage, it purposefully priorities hip-hop and related genres. Editorial control and user input guide a collection tailored for targeted listening. Partnerships fill gaps in niche content. Evaluating any streaming service based on intentional collection scope and published catalog focus provides realistic expectations when searching its library. For desired tracks unavailable on Audiomack, linking multiple platforms enables comprehensive music access.
Frequently Asked Questions About Audiomack’s Music Library
How many songs does Audiomack have compared to Spotify?
Audiomack has around 5 million tracks compared to Spotify’s 80+ million. But Audiomack hand selects songs fitting user tastes versus Spotify’s universal catalog.
What is Audiomack’s content and upload policy?
Can Audiomack recommend music not available on the service?
Yes, Audiomack’s algorithms highlight related music recommendations. These can point users to complementary artists and albums not actually available on Audiomack itself currently.
Why are some songs unavailable for streaming offline?
Downloading rights are set by labels on a song-by-song basis. In some cases, labels restrict making songs available for offline listening even if streaming online is allowed.
Does Audiomack allow users to request missing songs?
Yes, Audiomack provides a “Request Song” feature to ask for specific tracks and albums you’d like added to the service’s streaming catalog for future licensing consideration.Sharing Is Caring: